Many pro-life supporters are in favor of abortion in such a case; However, cases where they reject it outweigh cases where they can accept it. This issue can only be adequately resolved by objective intervention by the law, which must protect both pregnant women and unborn children. Third, the war on women has been particularly powerful, leading many to believe that Christians must act in concert against the legitimacy of abortion of any kind, even to the point of condemning miscarriage itself. Individuals who are trying to recruit strict Christians for this war do so under the pretext that the Bible itself requires such a restriction. On the other hand, this is not the case, the Bible does not explicitly deny abortion once; In fact, the opposite is true. Not only were abortion methods certainly understood at that time, but there are occasions when the Bible says that God commands such a thing to happen. The examples can be found in Genesis 38 `Tamar: Killing an Unwanted Pregnancy`. In this story, the Bible says that the slaughter of an unborn child is important if it is something other than a child conceived in a way that the mother`s society needs. The book of Scripture is not hostile to abortion.

Rather, I conclude that there is an unbiblical movement that claims to use the Bible as a medium for attacks on women who do not carry the pregnancy to term, whether or not it is an unintentional loss. Abortion restrictions versus abortion pose greater socioeconomic challenges in society compared to consent (This is our thesis) Foster, Diana Greene, et al. „Socioeconomic outcomes of women receiving abortions and women denied wanted abortions in the United States.“ American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 108, No. 3, March 2018, pp. 407-413. EBSCOhost, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247. […] Abortion was introduced before the 1880s and has come a long way since, including legalization following the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision. In recent years, abortion has been repeatedly questioned. This topic of popular debate has essentially divided society into two […] Most, if not all, of the reasons abortion opponents abhor abortion abhor abortion are based on religious principles.

If the religious basis is removed from the image, then they have no concrete reason. Thus, using the Christian or religious perspective to make abortion illegal means depriving non-religious citizens of certain basic rights. Anti-abortion and pro-abortion activists have become hardliners; This implies that both parties adhere to the belief and belief that it is right. Supporters on both sides did not listen to the other`s side. Looking at both sides of the debate, it`s important to realize that they`re making real arguments. Noonan, J. (1979). A private decision, abortion in America in the seventies.

New York: Free Press. But it is also important to look at the other side of the coin; What if the pregnancy puts a woman`s life at risk and doctors can`t perform an abortion because they`re afraid of losing their jobs and facing lawsuits for illegal abortion? This is an issue that the Conservatives have not addressed and that does not seem ready. It may be possible to make abortion illegal, but it should be noted that it will not stop whether it is legalized or illegal. Women, especially people with financial disabilities, will use the services of unqualified doctors or resort to other illegal means that can be even more deadly than if the act is legalized by qualified and licensed professionals. In this argumentative essay on abortion, I assume there are many arguments to justify legalizing abortion, but I will mention only a few important things; First, it supports the human rights that matter most to women by giving them a choice or a choice; It reduces misconduct by reducing the number of children growing up in less than ideal conditions. In addition, women have the option of opting for abortion for certain important reasons. The privilege of choosing these decisions should be in the hands of the mother to make decisions that affect her own body. According to the National Bureau of Health Research (2007), there are times when subtleties occur during pregnancy and the doctor decides to spare the mother`s life. Obviously, this implies that the fetus dies and the mother lives, but it would be better than losing both the existences of the mother and the unborn child. For this situation, abortion is advocated, a pregnant mother and her unborn child, where pregnancy difficulties can lead to the loss of the life of both, it is better to spare the life of the mother by abortion. Abortion is a problem in today`s society, taking innocent lives away from people who agree or disagree.

Although women now have the right to decide what to do with their bodies and whether they want to end a baby`s life, there are options other than abortion. Every life is precious, […] Second, most counterarguments against legalizing abortion are based on morality. According to Cornides (2008), human rights and ethical principles cannot be exchanged in the ongoing abortion debate. For example, banning abortion on the grounds that it violates God`s law and contradicts society`s morally accepted values. The issue of morality is in no way comparable to the violation of individual rights, such as denying women the right to decide what they want, because it is a guarantee of any free society.